Category: Aviation law

Posted on

Key aspects of the FEA process


Model creation: A CAD model of the fuselage truss is imported into FEA software like Ansys Workbench.
Material definition: The appropriate material properties are assigned to the truss elements (e.g., aluminum alloy, composite materials like CFRP).


Load and boundary conditions:
Loads: Simulate flight loads, such as pressure on the fuselage, and loads from other components like wings, engine, and landing gear.


Boundary conditions: Apply constraints to represent how the structure is supported, such as fixing certain edges.


Meshing: The geometry is discretized into a mesh of smaller elements (e.g., beam or shell elements) for the analysis to solve.


Solution: The FEA solver calculates the stresses, strains, and deformations throughout the structure based on the applied loads and boundary conditions.


Post-processing: Results are visualized as plots and animations to show how the truss deforms and where the highest stresses occur.

Posted on

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of an aircraft fuselage

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of an aircraft fuselage truss is a method used to simulate and analyze the structural performance of a truss-like fuselage, which is a rigid framework of members like beams and struts.

FEA models the truss as a system of interconnected elements to calculate deformations, stresses, and strains under various load conditions, ensuring the structure meets performance requirements like strength and minimum weight.

This process is crucial for modern aircraft design optimization, helping to create lightweight yet strong structures

Posted on

Product liability

Source: www.fasterway.com.au

This is a typical fracture surface. This is a threaded connection (hence the appearance of a depression around the circumference).

The fracture surface was smooth, flat, and perpendicular to the principal axis of the bolt. Crack progression marks (beach marks) extended radially from one side of the bolt and covered approximately 90% of the fracture surface area. The remaining small region towards the outer edge of the bolt exhibited features consistent with an overstress failure. The large area of fatigue cracking and small overstress area indicated that failure of the bolt was due to high cycle low stress fatigue cracking.

Bolt fracture surface showing evidence of fatigue crack progression (beach) marks

Bolt fracture surface showing evidence of fatigue crack progression (beach) marks

Source: ATSB

On 30 May 2015, a Fasterway powered parachute, recreational registration 19-7677, collided with terrain near Theodore, Queensland. The pilot, the sole occupant, died as a result of the accident.

Submitted eyenut and fractured bolt

Source: ATSB – Investigation title: Technical assistance to Recreational Aviation Australia in the examination of a fractured eyebolt from the collision with terrain involving a Fasterway Powered Parachute, near Theodore, Qld. on 30 May 2015

Investigation number: AE-2015-075

Posted on

Liability for aircraft components

This presentation was delivered by Dr WIlliam Higgs and Geoffrey Parker SC of Elizabeth Street Chambers to the NSW Branch Aviation Law Association of Australia and New Zealand on Thursday 16 July 2015.

The presentation is aptly entitled “Liability for aircraft components – including case studies – how not to get fatigued!” although it contains more aviation than law!

The hypothesis is that a little bit of aircraft engineering knowledge would assist in identifying the cause of the crash – specifically by shaping your preliminary thesis and identification of experts – ultimately to guide you in ascertaining the cause of the crash. This dictates case theory.

The presentation concludes with a Case study – Crash of Robinson R-22 Mariner II helicopter (VH-MIB) on 30 May 2004.

McDermott & Ors v Robinson Helicopter Company Incorporated – [2014] QCA 357

McDermott v Robinson Helicopter Company – [2014] QSC 34

The authors thank both (i) the ATSB for the images contained in the presentation: reference ATSB TRANSPORT SAFETY INVESTIGATION REPORT – Aviation Occurrence Report – 200401917 and others and (ii) the University of Delft for some images from their course in aviation structures.

Liability for aircraft components – including case studies.