Chapter 6D Corps Act
- 2014-01-26
- By whiggs
- Posted in Fundraising (Chapter 6D)
Chapter 6D of the Act (ss 700-742) contains a highly prescriptive scheme in respect of the disclosures that are, and are not, to be made in respect of the corporate fundraising governed by the chapter.
Section 703 ensures that there can be no contracting out of the requirements of the chapter.
Sections 704 to 725 provide for the circumstances in which the disclosures required by Ch 6D are to be made and also set out the requirements that are to be met in respect of those disclosures.
Part 6D.3 sets out the prohibitions, liabilities and remedies in respect of corporate fundraising governed by Ch 6D.
The provisions that create the statutory right to compensation that are relevant for present purposes are ss 728(1) and 729.
When ss 728 and 729 were recast into their present form by the Corporate Law Economic Reform Program Act 1999 (Cth), par 8.1 of the Explanatory Memorandum accompanying the bill stated that a purpose of the sections was as follows:
‘to ensure that issuers continue to provide full disclosure in the associated prospectus, issuers will be liable to investors in relation to the prospectus.’
Securities are broadly defined in s 92 of the Act.
A ‘disclosure document’ for an offer of securities is defined in s 9 as including, inter alia, a ‘prospectus for the offer’.
Sections 731, 732 and 733 set out a number of the defences, such as due diligence, lack of knowledge and reasonable reliance, that are available in respect of contraventions of s 728 and claims under s 729.
Sections 737 and 738 establish a limited right to return securities and to recover the money paid.
Sections 741 and 742 provide for exemptions from, and modifications to, Ch 6D by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission or by regulations.
Several features of the statutory scheme in respect of disclosure documents, which include prospectuses, should be noted.
SEARCH BLOG POSTS
LATEST BLOG POSTS
- Updated product safety mandatory reporting guidance for suppliers now available
- Pleading fraud – cause and effect is essential
- Does the Trustee’s right of indemnity have priority over the right of beneficiaries in relation to assets?
- Rules of war (in a nutshell) | The Laws Of War
- MH370 Final Report
Past Blog Posts
- December 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- August 2020
- February 2020
- September 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- December 2017
- May 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
Categories
- Appeals
- Artificial Intelligence
- Aviation law
- Banking and Finance Law
- Blogs
- Civil Liability Act
- Class Actions
- Coding for lawyers
- common law
- Consumer Claims (TPA)
- Contract Law
- Contractual Interpretation
- Criminal law
- Deeds
- Docassemble
- duty of care
- Engineering Law
- Equity
- Evidence
- Exclusion Clauses
- Execution of documents
- Expert Witness
- featured
- Financial Services
- Fraud
- Fundraising (Chapter 6D)
- General comment
- Home Building Law
- Insurance
- Legal drafting
- Local Court
- Medical Negligence
- MH370
- Motor Accidents
- Negligence
- Occupiers negligence
- Other
- Personal Injury
- Personal Property Securities (PPSA)
- Pleading
- Practice & Procedure
- Products Liability
- Property
- Real Property
- Reasons for a decision
- Securitisation
- Security (Mortgages & Charges)
- Sentencing
- Swaps & Derivatives
- Teaching
- Transactional Law
- Transfer of financial assets in transactions
- Trusts & Trustee Law
- Uncategorized
- War and Weaponry
- Witnesses
SEARCH BLOG POSTS
LATEST BLOG POSTS
- Updated product safety mandatory reporting guidance for suppliers now available
- Pleading fraud – cause and effect is essential
- Does the Trustee’s right of indemnity have priority over the right of beneficiaries in relation to assets?
- Rules of war (in a nutshell) | The Laws Of War
- MH370 Final Report
Past Blog Posts
- December 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- August 2020
- February 2020
- September 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- December 2017
- May 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
Categories
- Appeals
- Artificial Intelligence
- Aviation law
- Banking and Finance Law
- Blogs
- Civil Liability Act
- Class Actions
- Coding for lawyers
- common law
- Consumer Claims (TPA)
- Contract Law
- Contractual Interpretation
- Criminal law
- Deeds
- Docassemble
- duty of care
- Engineering Law
- Equity
- Evidence
- Exclusion Clauses
- Execution of documents
- Expert Witness
- featured
- Financial Services
- Fraud
- Fundraising (Chapter 6D)
- General comment
- Home Building Law
- Insurance
- Legal drafting
- Local Court
- Medical Negligence
- MH370
- Motor Accidents
- Negligence
- Occupiers negligence
- Other
- Personal Injury
- Personal Property Securities (PPSA)
- Pleading
- Practice & Procedure
- Products Liability
- Property
- Real Property
- Reasons for a decision
- Securitisation
- Security (Mortgages & Charges)
- Sentencing
- Swaps & Derivatives
- Teaching
- Transactional Law
- Transfer of financial assets in transactions
- Trusts & Trustee Law
- Uncategorized
- War and Weaponry
- Witnesses